In the olden days, just after the advent of electricity and indoor toilets, a mere boy could enter Law School. One could petition the Dean, or just plead insanity. I did the former at the age of nineteen and started down that long dusty road called confrontation; my dear father pushing the cart uphill.
One of the early minefields was the study of “Contracts”, which came in a variety of flavors and validities. Doctor Marsh showed us the ways that one may prosper or screw up in our dealings with man. There were oral, written, implied, bilateral, unilateral, and multilateral. There were restrictive, permissive; some unenforceable. They involved promises, delarations, vows and penalty clauses. In simpler terms they could be the “cats meow” or “the kiss of death”.
One term kept bobbing up; “Covenant”. It first raised it’s ugly head as a type of promise called CC&R’s (covenants, conditions, and restrictions. I had seen the word covenant before; but in the context of homeowner’s rules of behavior. They would rule out certain conduct. For instance, say one could not paint his house blue when everyone else’s was white. You could not build a windmill over 8’3″ in your backyard. Your Mercedes could not be over two years old, and have less than 350 horsepower, and leave the garage only on weekends; things even more ridiculous.
Where was it then that I had remembered that covenants could be a good thing? Church! That was it. I immediately started to dismiss their consideration because they were oral agreements (and we all know where that leads): Down the primrose path.
Yet in the Word, an entirely “legal” instrument, there is great support for the idea that covenants work. It is an agreement between two entities; Us and God, described in simple language not to be found in most legal documents; “Know, recognize and understand therefore that the Lord your God, He is God. Who keeps covenant and steadfast love and mercy with those who love Him and keep His commandments, to a thousand generations”.
You may ask; “Would that hold up in mans court of Law”
A slick lawyer on retainer could not get it past small calims. However in God’s court, it has every element required – mutual promises, performance and time frames. It is not ambiguous. It is valid because both parties have the resources and capability to make it binding.
You also may wonder; did you finish? Then answer is yes, in a way; but I grew up a bit first; When I was a child I thought as a child… seeking to please my earthly father, forever studying witten agreements to be continually tested and contested. Or I could surrender to God’s plan to be who he made me to be. When I truly grow up I will know what that is… right now it is in the hands of the jury.
I’m praying for acquittal or at least time off for good behavior. It’s a sin to hang juries.







